성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. Although the summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant's profit derived from the crime of this case is much smaller than the additional collection amount recognized by the court below, the court below erred by mismisunderstanding the fact and calculating an excessive additional collection charge.
2. According to each of the statements prepared by the Defendant and the suspect interrogation protocol of the Defendant, after the commission of the instant crime, after the Defendant was discovered, the Defendant is one-half customer a day, and the Defendant receives 80,000 won from the customer as the cost of marina and commercial sex acts, and pays 40,000 won among them to female employees, and the average prize of 80,000 won per day is recognized.
In addition, according to the records, the defendant's act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. for business purposes (from November 30, 2012 to September 16, 2013) is recognized as a total of 13,065,00, even if the credit card sales are limited to the period during which the defendant performed acts of arranging sexual traffic,
The lower court’s judgment that calculated the amount of additional collection based on the above evidence is justifiable.
(3) The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant made a false statement as one to two customers a day, different from the fact, but according to the result of the examination of the defendant at the court below, the defendant did not make consistent statements or statements sufficient to recognize that there was an error in the preparation process. 3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.