According to the judgment of the court of first instance maintained by the court below, the court below held that the person who is responsible for the general business of the company under the Labor Standards Act (Article 15 of the Labor Standards Act) refers to the person who is responsible for the general business of the company and represents or represents the company externally with comprehensive delegation of all or part of the business operation by the business owner. Furthermore, in light of the records, the court below found that the defendant 1 is a production management director of the non-indicted corporation, who manufactures books and gals, etc. as a production management director of the non-indicted corporation, the defendant 2 is a business-related director, and the defendant 3 is merely a business-related director who is in charge of planning and planning as an audit and inspection office, and the above defendants cannot be a business manager who is responsible for the above company's wage payment for the above company's employees, and therefore, the defendants cannot be deemed a business manager who is responsible for the above company's wage payment, and therefore, the above judgment or finding of facts constitutes a violation of the rules of evidence by the court of first instance.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Kim Yong-sung (Presiding Justice)