사기
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the victim was unaware of the fact that he was ordered by the Defendants from the investigation agency to the court of the court below in the course of performing the construction work by subcontracting the construction work from the Defendants to the court of the court below, and even though he consistently stated that he was unable to receive the construction cost promised by the Defendants even after the completion of the construction work, the court below acquitted the Defendants.
2. On September 20, 2011, the Defendants in the facts charged are the Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”) operated by Defendant A, who is located under Defendant A, of the Gwangju Mine-gu E building 201.
(2) At the office, the victim G stated that “The Defendant B and the victim did not have any intent or ability to pay the price for construction to the victim within 15 days from the date of every receipt from the ordering office.” However, on the basis of the promissory note claim against F on August 8, 2011, before the Defendants and the victim entered into the construction contract for the said Y, the amount of KRW 370,000,000, F had with respect to the claim for construction price of KRW 370,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00.