When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a certified broker who operates a DNA certified brokerage office in Gwangjin-gu Seoul and 209.

On April 18, 2013, the Defendant: (a) delegated the right of lease to 401 F building in Seoul Special Metropolitan City by E, a lessor on April 18, 2013; and (b) entered into a lease agreement with G with the lessee at a monthly rent of three million won; (c) however, there was no delegation on the preparation of a lease agreement with the lessee at a rate of three million won after

At the end of May, 2013, the Defendant tried to sublease this house to another person at the brokerage office that operated the said brokerage office from H. A. In addition, the Defendant: (a) drafted a new lease agreement with a monthly rent of KRW 3 million and 3,200,000 which is the monthly rent; and (b) requested that the lessee prepare a new lease agreement with a monthly rent of KRW 3,200,000,000,000,000,000,0000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00,00,00.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising the above E's proxy qualification, the Defendant prepared a chapter on the monthly rent contract for apartment, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of part of the witness H in the eight-time public trial records;

1. Protocol of examination of witness (E);

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statement protocol (including apartment monthly rent contract) to E;

1. Relevant Article 232 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;