If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On January 5, 2013, at least 11:30 on January 5, 2013, the Defendant ordered the Defendant to kill the victim as if the Defendant would pay food value in a D restaurant operated by the victim C, Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, even though the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the food value.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received a total of KRW 52,00,00, such as 2 man-mades and 2 soldiers, etc., which were caused by the victim.

2. On January 5, 2013, from around 12:00 to 13:30, the Defendant obstructed the victim C’s restaurant business by force by following the following: (a) the Defendant scams the customers “I am soon if I am,” without any reason, to “I am scam, and women I am scam from the lowest scam,” thereby interfering with the victim C restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act as the first point in the decision: Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

4. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.