If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around August 21, 2013, the Defendant stated that the victim D(the age of 27) around the Busan Franchisium in Busan Franchisc Group C refers to that the Defendant would have been seated with a man who is in the vicinity of the breakwater under the influence of alcohol, on the ground that the Defendant would not listen to the horses, and that the Defendant would not have been able to say, the Defendant would have been able to say that the Defendant would have been able to say that he would not have been able to say, and the Defendant would have been able to say that he would have been able to say that he would have been able to say, and the victim E (the age of 33) would have been able to take the bridge of D, and the victim would have been able to take the bridge by drinking and drinking it against D, and that the victim would have been able to take the face one time to drink, and that the victim would have been able to suffer an injury, such as an injury in need of treatment for three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E, D, or F;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;