2. The judgment of the court below is very significant in the amount of damage of the defendant caused by the crime of this case, the defendant did not want to be detained by the defendant due to the crime of this case, and there are unfavorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case again even though he was under suspension of execution due to the crime of this case, and the defendant did not appeal to the judgment of the court below. The defendant did not appeal to the judgment of the court below. The defendant did not want to punish the defendant. The defendant did not agree to pay the defendant by October 30, 2014 (the remaining agreed amount of 113,00,000,000 won in the process of the above agreement was paid until October 30, 2014, although the victim did not want to receive the payment of the above money, the victim did not want to receive the payment of the above money from the date when the business is in progress with the defendant. In light of the circumstances surrounding the crime of this case, the defendant is elderly, and the circumstances and circumstances of the defendant's new motive or changes in sentencing after the defendant's evidence.

Therefore, the prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.