If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On July 10, 2013, around 21:43, the Defendant assaulted the victim on two occasions, while talking about the victim D (n, 40 years of age) and the attachment of the apartment line notice, etc. at the entrance of the entrance of the Goyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City C apartment 101-3-4, 3-4, Goyang-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Results of verification of sound recording files CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (CCTV image verification);

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that: (a) there was a minor physical contact between the Defendant and D; or (b) D’s act constitutes self-defense or legitimate act by committing the instant crime in an effort to defend them; (c) in light of the motive, circumstance, means and method of the instant crime, damage result, relationship between the Defendant and the victim before and after the instant crime, and the degree of assault and assault, etc., it is not recognized that the Defendant’s act was a justifiable act that does not violate the current unfair infringement of his or others’ legal interests, or that it does not violate social rules.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.