When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 20, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 22:48 on December 20, 2016, the Defendant: (b) was engaged in as if he would pay the amount to the victim; (c) issued an order to engage in alcohol and alcohol; and (d) the Defendant received an order from the injured party at KRW 200,000 of the market price.

However, as the defendant does not possess cash or a credit card or other means of payment during the number of the defendants, there was no ability to pay the price even if he takes an order of drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

On March 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 21:10 on March 21, 2017, the Defendant: (b) took place in the “G” operated by the Victim F (M, 48 years of age) E, as if he would pay the amount to the victim; and (c) ordered the alcohol and the kitchen; and (d) was provided with beer and beer in an amount equivalent to KRW 23,00 in the market price from the victim.

However, the fact that the defendant does not possess cash or credit cards or other means of payment during the number of the defendants, and thus, he did not have the ability to pay the price even if he takes an order of drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. "At the court's order of 2017 Highest 2" of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Receipts, on-site photographs "2017 Highest 92";

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of receipts, on-site photographs statutes;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant requires a strict punishment during or immediately after the period of a repeated crime of the same kind. However, confession, depth is expressed, fraud is not high, and it is agreed with the victims.