For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the charge of this case on the ground that there was no proof of crime.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the record, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the criminal intent of defraudation in fraud, contrary to what is alleged in

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.