beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.10.01 2013고단4786

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 17, 2007, the defendant was sentenced to 8 years of imprisonment for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties at the Busan District Court and 2 years of suspended execution.

1. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2013. 6. 29. 04:00경 부산 연제구 C에 있는 D주점 내에서, 112 신고를 받고 출동한 E지구대 소속 경위 F이 피고인에게 술값을 지불하고 귀가할 것을 안내하자 화가 난다는 이유로 ‘아무일도 아니다, 법대로 해라. 공무원이 공사구분을 해야지. 씨발 놈아 짭새 새끼"라고 소리를 지르며 주먹으로 위 F의 가슴을 1회 때려 112 신고 업무 등 직무를 집행하는 경찰관을 폭행하였다. 2. 모욕 피고인은 제1항 기재 일시 및 장소에서, 피해자 F을 위와 같이 때린 후 위 포장마차 업주 G 및 종업원 H 등 10여명이 있는 가운데 재차 피해자에게 ‘씨발년, 개새끼, 좆같은 새끼야. 너희 같은 년 놈들은 모가지를 짤라 버릴 거다. 대가리를 쳐 발라 삘라."라고 욕설을 하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of H and F;

1. Before ruling: The application of criminal records and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (it is not good for the same type of criminal records to be committed in several times, but contingent crimes committed in the state of detention, not causing damage, making efforts to recover damage, taking into account the circumstances in which family members should support, and deep reflects, etc.);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;