However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 16, 2017, at around 20:40, the Defendant received 112 reports from D real estate offices located in the Haan-gun, Haan-gun, Haan-gun, on the 16th day of May 16, 2017, on the 112th day of which the Defendant refused to present his identification card from a police officer, a police officer of the Haan Police Station E police box, who was a police officer of the Haan Police Station, to refuse to dispatch his identification card, and attempted to keep the chest side of the said G out of the control site, and continued to stop from the F, the Defendant took the left hand of the said F one time.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A statement prepared by H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., the confession and reflect, the extent of violence is relatively minor, and the submission of a letter of no punishment by demanding the victimized police officers to use the letter of no punishment);