beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.05.29 2016고단7571

절도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 7571"

1. The Defendant committed the crime on October 12, 2016, at around 20:14, around October 12, 2016,: (a) around 20:14, at the E-store operated by the victim D, who was located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the victim’s attention was stolen by taking advantage of the gap in which the victim’s attention was neglected; (b) seven bread in the display stand amounting to KRW 15,000 in the total market price of the victim’s ownership, which is located in the display stand. On October 23, 2016, the Defendant brought about a theft of KRW 11,100 in advance, such as three freshers in the display stand operated by the victim G located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon, by taking advantage of the gap in which the victim’s attention was neglected; (c) around October 23, 2016, the Defendant brought about a theft plastic bag of KRW 11,100.

"2017 Highest 549"

1. Larceny;

A. On September 25, 2016, from around 09:11 to 09:36, the Defendant collected and stolen food in the shopping bags prepared in advance of the market price of 400,000 won, including the sunlight, using the gaps of employees’ surveillance negligence.

B. On September 26, 2016, around 15:40, the Defendant entered the M Hospital 622, located in the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City L, and confirmed the absence of any person, and stolen an unclaimed city of the market value, which is the victim N, owned within the facility.

2. Attempted larceny;

A. On September 26, 2016, the Defendant, at the K convenience store operated by the victim J in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City on September 26, 2016, was collected in the shopping bags prepared in order to steals food in the market value, such as milk, etc. by taking advantage of the gaps in the surveillance of employees, and did not have been discovered to a large employee, but did not commit an attempted crime.

B. On September 26, 2016, around 20:10, the Defendant entered a six-story multi-use room of the six-story M hospital, as indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1-B, and was collected in the shopping bags that had been managed by the victim’sO in advance, and the Defendant did not constitute the victim’s awareness.