A. At around 00:05 on December 30, 2012, G driven a H car (hereinafter “the instant hazard vehicle”) and caused a traffic accident caused by the front part of the Plaintiff A’s IF car (hereinafter “the instant damaged vehicle”) in front of the instant hazard vehicle, which was driven on the road, along the two-lanes of the Gyeong-gun in the front of the Hah-gun in the front of the Hah-gun in the front of the Hah-gun in the front of the Hah-gun in the front of the Hah-gun in the front of the Hah-gun in the front of the Hah-gun in the front of the Hah-gun in the front of the Hah-gun in the front of the Hah-gun in the front of the Hah-gun in the front of the instant traffic accident.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant traffic accident”). (b)

Plaintiff

A due to the instant traffic accident, A received medical treatment, such as being hospitalized in J Hospital by suffering injuries, such as salt pane, dystyp, dystypium, LAA, LA, LA, LA, tensions, and tensions, the lower hyspium, and the hyspium.

C. The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with G with respect to the instant Maritime Vehicle.

Plaintiff

B, C, D, E, F (hereinafter “Plaintiff B, etc.”) are children of Plaintiff A.

[Ground for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 4-1 through 5, Gap evidence 6-1, 2, Gap evidence 7-1, 2, Gap evidence 13-1 through 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion argues that the traffic accident of this case in this case caused damages to the plaintiff A, including KRW 8,131,920, KRW 350,780, KRW 350,000, KRW 350,000, KRW 2421,960, and KRW 10,000,000, KRW 400,000,000,000, KRW 350,000, and KRW 2,421,960, KRW 1,000,000, respectively, to the effect that

B. According to the facts of recognition in 1.1, prior to the occurrence of damages liability, G is the instant case.