A Imprisonment with prison labor of 10 months and fines of 7,00,000, Defendant B's imprisonment with prison labor of 6 months, Defendant C's imprisonment with prison labor of 8 months and fine of 8 months.

Defendant

A 'K' and 'K'’’’’’’’’’’’ and 4,5 stories above the ground of the 9th floor of the building in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul. The head of the team in charge of the above entertainment tavern, Defendant C, and Defendant D, Defendant E, and Defendant F (e.g. L) are working as a regular business. Upon receiving instructions from the owner of the business, Defendant E and the general manager of the above 1st floor to use the 3th floor from the 1st floor of the above building as a guide for the entertainment drinking house and a glass room selecting women to select female employees from the third floor of the above 3rd floor of the ground, and then, in each room of the above 'J' and 'K’s entertainment drinking house, the male customer selected female employees from the 3rd floor of the above 'J' and the above 'K to use the 'report' as a similarity act involving male guests' and to use the above entertainment drinking house to the 'M 6.8th floor and operation of the above '.

On April 30, 2015, the Defendants: (a) received 320,000 won from P, including the price for sexual traffic, from the customer, and (b) caused the name and influence of female employees to engage in the act of similarity, such as having the name and influence of female employees enjoying the said P’s sexual organ in his/her room; (c) around 22:30 on the same day, the Defendants moved the said P and female employees to 701 at the 22:30 date.

In collusion with the above M and the above N, the Defendants engaged in the act of arranging commercial sex acts, etc. through the above method 2,974 times in total from October 17, 2014 to the above temporary date, as shown in the attached Table 1 and 2.

The written indictment states that "a total of 951,691,731 won has been made by doing acts, such as arranging sexual traffic," but the part concerning business profits does not constitute a requisite fact.