When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a taxi driver, and both victims B, C, and D are customers using a taxi operated by the defendant.

1. Around August 2016, the Defendant, at around August 2016, 2016, embezzled the Defendant’s thought that he had without following necessary procedures, such as discovering one gal lusium jusium 900,000, at G-si operated by the Defendant in the F Commissioner of the F Tax Division, the victim B fell from a G-si operated by the Defendant, and returning the said victim.

2. Around December 2016, the Defendant, on his own initiative, embezzled the Defendant on his own idea, without following necessary procedures, such as discovering one unit of so-called galloned cell phone in order to find out the victim C’s galtholy damaged market at the 1,000,000, in G taxi operated by the Defendant on the Sgalth street of the I bank located in M of Frigu, Busan around December 2016 and returning it to the said victim.

3. Around May 2017, the Defendant embezzled the Defendant’s thought to have on his own, without following the necessary procedures, such as discovering a doping gallon gallon S7 mobile phone unit at the market price where the victim D was damaged by flood in the L taxi operated by the Defendant, in his/her own name, at around May 2017, the Defendant embezzled it without following the necessary procedures, such as discovering one gallon gallon S7 mobile phone unit and returning it to the said victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of each police statement related to C and D;

1. Investigation report (where gallons block, specification of S5 mobile phone prices), investigation report (transfer of mobile phones);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;