마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
The Defendant asserts to the effect that the punishment would be mitigated because he actively cooperated in the investigation of other narcotics-related crimes. However, the Defendant’s cooperation, which is the mitigated element in the sentencing guidelines, refers to the case where the relevant person has contributed to the investigation to the extent that it is possible to prosecute the criminal or add the criminal prosecution by clarifying specific and accurate facts with respect to the narcotics-related crimes falling under one or more of the following subparagraphs. - The Defendant’s cooperation does not amount to the crimes of heavier nature in the stages of the crimes, crimes, crimes, crimes committed by many persons, and crimes, and the quantities, frequencies, periods, etc. of narcotics, etc. even if they fall under the same type: (a) types of crimes falling under the four types (for profit-making or habitual crimes), such as the sale and purchase, and the export and import, and the three types of large-scale crimes (for profit-making or habitual crimes) or the three types of crimes (for profit-making or 50 million won or more) (the value of narcotics-related crimes). Therefore, it cannot be said that the new sentencing of the lower court.
In light of all the circumstances described in the reasoning of sentencing and all other conditions of sentencing indicated in the records, it cannot be deemed that the court below's sentence against the defendant is too unreasonable.
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.