beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.02.18 2019고단4925

강제추행등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, for six months, and for four months, for defendant C, respectively.

However, the above judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant B, at the Daegu District Court, sentenced Defendant B, on April 11, 2019, to a suspended sentence of two years for a year of imprisonment with prison labor for special obstruction of performance of official duties, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 22, 2019.

Defendants are visitors to the Fjust points in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu where victims D (V, 22 years old) work as part-time clients.

1. On August 10, 2019, Defendant A, while drinking alcohol at the above main station around August 23:30, 2019, used the victim’s hand knife with the victim’s hand knife who did not inform the victim of his phone number despite having been known. The victim’s hand knife from the victim’s right knife to bucks.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

2. At around 01:50 on August 16, 2019, Defendant B, at the above main point, tried to put the victim’s abund with the victim’s driver’s hand and to sit the victim’s side to the Defendant’s seat.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

Defendant A and C are the employees of “G”, a ice forest distributor, and Defendant A were in charge of the supply of ice cream from January 1, 2017 to July 14, 2018, 2018, the victim H from September 1, 2017 to July 14, 2018, the victim’s other place of business. Defendant A and C were in charge of the supply of ice cream from July 15, 2018 to July 14, 2018. Defendant C were in charge of the supply of ice cream in the aforesaid L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based.

1. Defendant A, using the fact that at the time of the supply of the ice cream, Defendant A did not confirm only the daily amount of the ice cream items but confirmed only the amount of the ice cream items at the time of the supply of the ice cream items operated by the victim, Defendant A expressed his mind to acquire the pecuniary benefits equivalent to the difference by deducting part of the ice cream items from the part of the ice cream.

The defendant on January 2017.