2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant reflects his mistake and has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime; (b) the profits actually earned by the defendant from each of the crimes of this case are not large; and (c) the defendant is not an accomplice who is an accomplice. However, even though the amount of damage caused by each of the crimes of this case is reasonable, the crime is not good; (d) the defendant does not make any effort to recover the victims from damage; (e) the defendant forges and exercises documents under the name of another for the purpose of deceiving money; and (e) other various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.