If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a real operator of C Co., Ltd.

On October 7, 2011, the Defendant, using a computer at a place where it is unknown at the beginning and around January 2013, using a computer, prepared a false complaint stating that “A dump truck purchased a dump truck with a loan of KRW 50 million in the name of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., by increasing the vehicle purchase price of KRW 67 million, and purchased the difference of KRW 17 million.” In this case, the Defendant, on January 4, 2013, prepared a false complaint stating that “A dump truck was punished for fraud,” and submitted the above complaint to a police official whose name is not known at the Public Service Center of the Seongbuk-gu Police Station, the Defendant filed the complaint with a police official.

Then, on February 1, 2013, the Defendant made a statement as a complainant at the investigation station of the Seongbuk-gu Police Station and the office of the Economic1 Team, and stated that “D, the Defendant, at his own discretion, arbitrarily obtained a loan of KRW 67 million in excess of KRW 50 million, and used the difference. However, it would be possible to obtain a vehicle purchase fund in the name of the bank in the bank in charge of a dispute resolution, and it would be possible to obtain a vehicle purchase fund in the name of the bank in charge of a bank in charge of a bank in charge of a bank in charge of a bank in charge of a bank in charge of a bank in charge of a bank in order to hold a vehicle purchase fund in the name of the bank in the name of the bank in charge of a bank in charge of a bank in receipt of a loan in the amount equivalent to the vehicle purchase fund by deceiving the complainant, and even after purchasing dum truck in the amount of KRW 50 million,000,000,000.”

However, in fact, when a dump truck is purchased by a dump truck, it is common practice to apply for a loan higher than the vehicle purchase price, taking into account the expenses for the registration of the relocation of the vehicle, the expenses for the maintenance of the vehicle until the occurrence of the vehicle operation profit, and also to lend funds exceeding the vehicle purchase price by reflecting the repayment ability of the dump owner and the corporation. In the process of the loan of this case, the Defendant, D, and the dump truck broker E are consulted around October 201.