However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Defendant

B is a person in charge of issuing orders for the manufacture of automation facilities as the person in charge of the production team of Singu Co., Ltd. (the representative F; hereinafter the “victim Co., Ltd.”) E (the “victim Co., Ltd.”). The Defendant A is a person who, among the first floor of Singu Factory, manufactures and supplies parts to the victim Co., Ltd. from the first floor of the Silgu Factory.

From May 31, 2015, the Defendants prepared a false statement of transactions, etc. on the basis of past supply data, etc. in custody of the victim company even though they did not manufacture parts, etc. equivalent to KRW 10,794,00 in G and supplied them to the victim company, and filed a claim for the payment of the price to employees in charge of accounting in the name of the victim company through the above employees to receive KRW 10,794,000 as the price for supply from the victim company to June 30, 2016, and received KRW 68,069,050 in total from the victim company's price for supply by claiming the payment in duplicate of the above method or the amount claimed in the existing amount over 13 times as shown in the list of crimes.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to acquire the property of the victim company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Prosecutorial suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police statement of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, including a complaint, detailed details of unjust enrichment, details of G tax invoices, details of G tax invoices, inquiries about details of G deposit transactions, detailed statement of deposit transactions, G purchase/receiving status, details of transaction, detailed statement of transaction, detailed statement of transaction (from January 1, 2015 to June 6, 2016), detailed reinforcement data of unjust enrichment, details of false requests for non-production, and unit price calculation;

1. Relevant Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code and Article 38 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes.