beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.10.24 2018나21922

부당이득금

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Grounds for the court's explanation concerning this case in this case are the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance.

B. (2) No. 5) of paragraph (5) of this Article, as the decision of the urban planning facilities (road) was announced on January 18, 1969, F divided the size of 1,091 before Gangdong-gu Seoul around February 28, 1976 into C through 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "number of lots of land divided from each of the above lands"), and sold H land to H to H to L. The part of H purchased by L to which L was divided into future P and Q to contribute to the completion of the instant land, and it was difficult to view that most of the following portions of the part of the I purchased by the deceased were to have been divided into the public road, such as I and R to have contributed to the completion of the instant land, and it was difficult to view that there was a significant increase in the ownership of each of the above land, including LF and Q to purchase each of the above divided land, and that it was within the period of time after each of the above divided land was divided into 198,61.