However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 30, 2019, at around 21:50, the Defendant driven a B-ro car without a driver’s license on the section of about 3km from the front day of the mutual unfluent drinking house, which is in a hiver behavior, to the front day of the gold street in the same city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Investigation report (report on the circumstances of an immigration driver);

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Application of the statutes on the register of driver's licenses;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (2) 2, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime, and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation, community service order, and order to attend a lecture for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the name of the crime is repeated within a short period after being sentenced to a summary order due to drinking driving. In light of such circumstances, the punishment is determined by taking into account the blood alcohol concentration, criminal records (one time before and after a fine for drinking), circumstances after the crime, Defendant’s age, and other sentencing conditions, and probation is added to prevent recidivism.