On May 5, 2017, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.159% from blood alcohol around 13:00, driven a car with C low alcohol in the section of about 20km from the road near the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 1587nd of the 20nd of the 1587nd of the 1587nd of the 150nd of the 1st of the 196th of the 20st of the 20nd of the

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Consent to blood collection and written confirmation;

1. A written appraisal of alcohol during blood;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 152 (1) and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of quantity is against the defendant's view and reflects his/her own criminal act, it is deemed necessary to isolate from society for a certain period of time in that the defendant committed the instant crime even during the suspension of execution, and that he/she had been punished twice for the same kind of crime.

However, the sentencing conditions of Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the fact that the defendant has a intellectual obstacle, the age, sex, environment, etc. of the defendant, shall be considered as the disposition.