폭행
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. 항소 이유의 요지 ① 2015. 11. 7. 운전 중 피고인이 피해자의 머리채를 잡아 흔드는 과정에서 손톱에 긁혀 이마와 눈썹 부위에 상처가 생겼고, 2015. 11. 30. 피해자가 집안을 뒤져 찾아낸 월급 명세서와 통장을 확인하려 하자 피고인이 달려들어 피해자의 양쪽 어깨를 잡아 밀치고 양팔을 잡아당겼다는 피해자의 일관된 진술을 신빙할 수 있는 점, ② 피해자가 제출한 사진에 손톱으로 할퀸 것으로 보이는 긴 상처와 팔 양쪽에 난 손가락 자국을 확인할 수 있는데, 위 상처는 일상생활에서 발생하기 어려운 상처인 점, ③ 피해자의 두 아들은 피고인과 거주하고 있고 피해자와 사이가 좋지 않아 그 진술에 신빙성이 있다고
In light of the fact that it is difficult to see that the Defendant committed each assault against the victim as stated in the facts charged, and each of the Defendant’s assault cannot be viewed as a justifiable act that does not go against the defense of the party or the social norms.
Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant of the facts charged is erroneous and has affected the conclusion of the judgment.
2. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the victim D (45 years old) and the husband and wife who reported marriage on October 31, 1999, who are currently in a divorce lawsuit.
A. On November 7, 2015, the Defendant committed a crime on November 7, 2015, within a passenger car driven by the victim in the Gunsan-si E apartment complex on November 18:40, 2015, the Defendant: (a) suspected of having a female relationship with the victim; (b) prevented the victim from taking away the victim’s cell phone; (c) prevented the victim from taking the victim’s head debt with a tight hand; and (d) assaulted the victim by flabing the victim’s head debt with the victim’s tight hand and the left-hand eye.
B. On November 30, 2015, the Defendant committed a crime on November 30, 2015, (i) around 01:50 on November 30, 2015, (ii) around 204 Dong705, and (iii) the victim suspected of having a male relationship with the Defendant, and (iv) was kept in custody of the Defendant’s sexual harassment.