성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
No person shall arrange, induce, induce, or compel sexual traffic in return for promising to receive money, valuables, or other property benefits from an unspecified person for business purposes.
Nevertheless, from September 2018 to May 28, 2019, the Defendant operated a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of "D", "Seoul Dong-gu Btel C, Daegu-gu Btel," and had many unspecified male customers, who reported the advertisement at the sexual traffic site and found the place, receive 100,000 won per customer, and let the female female employed by the Defendant do a similar act.
Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as the necessity of collection and the calculation of additional charges, etc.), investigation report (the attachment of details of cell phone calls for business purpose) investigation report (the decision to preserve a confiscation prior to prosecution), investigation report (the decision to preserve a confiscation prior to prosecution), investigation report (the necessity of collection and the calculation of additional charges, etc.) concerning E and F, report on the occurrence
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the punishment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, and Article 8 (1) of the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment;
1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc., takes into account the fact that the defendant had been engaged in a business such as arranging sexual traffic as his/her principal business, with heavy liability for the crime, and with multiple records of crimes, etc., the crime of this case shall be considered as the grounds for sentencing which are favorable to the defendant, such as the confession of the crime, and the fact that