손해배상
1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).
1. Basic facts
A. 1) N Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “N Co., Ltd.”) was changed to Q Co., Ltd. on September 24, 2003, and thereafter changed to R Co., Ltd. and S., respectively, and changed to N Co., Ltd on October 6, 2009.
“N” regardless of whether it was before or after the amendment.
(1) On May 12, 1999, the Board of Directors held the Appointor T (hereinafter “Appointed”)
(2) On January 15, 2001, the designated parties claimed N to convert the above convertible bonds into the shares, but on November 28, 2006, the above convertible bonds were registered as the full conversion of the shares. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 19648, Nov. 28, 2006>
3) Defendants B, C, D, and E are those who worked as N’s directors, and Defendant B was employed as N’s representative director and resigned on September 30, 2003. Defendant C was employed as N’s representative director from October 1, 2003 to June 23, 2006; Defendant D was employed as N’s representative director from June 23, 2006 to August 31, 2007, respectively. 4) the Plaintiff (the appointed party; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the appointed party were appointed as N’s representative director on January 18, 2007; and the Plaintiff was appointed as the representative director on March 30, 2007.
B. The issuance, etc. of convertible bonds of O Co., Ltd. 1) P Co., Ltd. (O. 9 October 2003) changed to U Co., Ltd. on October 6, 2009 and changed to O again.
"O" regardless of whether it is before or after the amendment;
(2) On May 12, 1999, the designated parties held a board of directors to issue the convertible bonds with the total face value and the subscription price of KRW 100,000,000 to the designated parties. (2) On January 15, 2001, the designated parties claimed on theO to convert the said convertible bonds into shares, but the said convertible bonds were registered as all of the shares on November 28, 2006.
3) Defendant F, G, and L are those who worked as directors of theO, and Defendant F was dismissed on January 18, 2007 while they worked as the representative director of theO. 4) The Plaintiff and the designated person were appointed as directors of theO on January 18, 2007.