A. The Defendant is a doctor to operate the J Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) received medical treatment at the Defendant Hospital on March 18, 2013, and died on November 10, 2014 while this lawsuit was pending.

Plaintiff

A is the deceased's spouse, and the rest of the plaintiffs are the deceased's children.

B. (1) The Deceased was suffering from normal high blood pressure and urology, and the blood pressure was used as a part of the treatment process for the Deceased.

On February 21, 2013, the Deceased decided to conduct an operation on March 5, 2013 after receiving medical treatment by visiting the Defendant Hospital.

(2) On March 5, 2013, the medical doctor in K, who provided medical treatment for the Deceased, said medical doctor in K, who provided the Deceased, was to suspend the use of his/her clothes in Cre recognition from February 27, 2013 on the ground of the scheduled surgery for the Deceased.

(3) On March 4, 2013, the Deceased submitted a written request for medical treatment to the Defendant Hospital to the effect that he/she was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital and was under drug treatment due to high blood pressure, and that he/she had known from February 27, 2013 that he/she would be able to suspend the use of cirre recognition clothes.

(4) On March 4, 2013, the Deceased was inspected at the heart in L, and the medical personnel solicited to perform an operation after undergoing a close inspection at the hospital or university hospital originally treated, and the above opinion was delivered to the medical personnel of the Defendant hospital.

(5) On March 4, 2013, the medical professionals at Defendant Hospital inspected the Deceased on the operation before the operation, confirmed the suspension of the use of Kan Hospital’s opinion and the Canstre recognition clothes. On March 5, 2013, the medical professionals at Defendant Hospital educated the Deceased and his guardian to take the rest other than Canre recognition.

(6) On March 5, 2013, the Defendant asked the Deceased’s heart test on the part of LA and recommended to conduct a close inspection.

Accordingly, the defendant did not perform the original scheduled surgery, and did not perform the close inspection on the guardian and the heart of the deceased.