2. Although part of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime and reflects on the fact that the victim and the investigative agency agreed to commit the crime, the defendant has been sentenced to suspension of execution and fine several times, and the suspension of execution was revoked after being sentenced to a suspended sentence for the same kind of crime in 2010. After being released from the prison on November 26, 2012 after being sentenced to a suspended sentence for the same crime, the suspended sentence was revoked. The defendant committed the crime in this case, even though he was sentenced to a fine for the same crime during the period of repeated crime after being released from the prison on November 26, 2012. The defendant committed the crime in this case under the influence of alcohol, and the crime in this case also committed the crime in this case. The defendant appears to have been under the influence of alcohol on the part of the victim and the investigative agency. However, the defendant continued to commit the crime in this case without having been under the influence of force on the part of the victim and his defense counsel's age to commit the crime in this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.