2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

A. The key issue of the instant case is (1) whether the Plaintiff did not take necessary measures or report under Article 54 of the Road Traffic Act after killing or injuring a person due to a traffic accident; and (2) whether the instant disposition revoking the Plaintiff’s driver’s license for the said reason was an unlawful act of deviating from or abusing the discretion.

B. On May 9, 2013, the first instance court held the first issue. ① On May 18:35, 2013, the Plaintiff installed a safety zone between the three-lanes in Busan Jinkdong, Busan, Busan, Busan, and the two and three-lanes in front of Busan, and the two and three-lanes are divided into the right way to the left, and the safety zone is established between the first and the second and the third-lanes.

As D, while stopping along the signal in the atmosphere, it is necessary to make a right-hand turn to the right-hand turn, the back of the damaged vehicle going back to the beam of the damaged vehicle, and the latter end of the damaged vehicle going back again in the future while receiving the signal on the road corresponding to the front of the damaged vehicle, and driving bypassing the vehicle and driving it into the luminous slope. ② Even though the injured party C, who was aboard the damaged vehicle, was able to b0 to 300 meters away, even though she was pursued by the light while she was boomed by the light, she stopped only due to another vehicle in the signal line. ③ The damaged vehicle was damaged by the said accident, which requires repair expenses of approximately KRW 35 million, including 30,000,000,000,000, and the injured vehicle also suffered from the injury of the injured vehicle in the criminal case, such as the Plaintiff’s testimony at the time when the injured vehicle was under the influence of C, such as the victim’s testimony.