However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 1, 2020, at around 01:40, the Defendant, at the residence of the Defendant in Kimhae-si B and C, received a report on 112 of the Defendant’s spouse D’s domestic violence, and called “A” to the Defendant in order for the Defendant to grasp the circumstances of the instant case, the Defendant was able to look at the Defendant’s chest part of the said F at one time, with both hand, and was able to look at the f’s head.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the 112 reporting processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act - Unfavorable circumstances: The existence of several times of punishment force in relation to violence, and crimes during the period of probation due to the crime of injury (current age is limited to the degree of probation period): Confession, reflectivity, minor violence, non-members of the punishment of victimized police officers - Other circumstances: The age of the defendant, character and conduct, circumstances after the crime, etc.