[2] On July 15, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspension of the execution of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court on July 12, 2016, and on February 12, 2016, the suspension of the execution of the above execution was revoked on the grounds of protection observation, community service failure, etc. by the Busan District Court, and on May 12, 2016, the execution of the above sentence was completed in the Busan Detention House.

[2] On July 22, 2016, around 15:40, the Defendant was present at the Busan District Court No. 353, which was located in the Busan District Court as a witness in the case of injury to Defendant B, etc. at the above court No. 2016, 2016, and 211.

At around 15:00 on March 17, 2015, the above case was known that B used the victim E and the body fighting at the house located in the Busan Northern apartment on the part of Busan Northern apartment on March 17, 2015, and caused the victim E and the victim's side flive face once a week, the victim D's chest part flive face was flive to the victim E, and the victim D's chest part was flive for about 5 weeks medical treatment, and the victim D was assaulted to the victim D, and the fact B was flished to the victim Eul, and the defendant directly told the fighting between B and E, and therefore, B was aware that B used the flive act.

Nevertheless, the defendant should not oppose the prosecutor's "Irre B, as you have set up against it."

The newspaper " was not a situation that would not oppose the question."

It is necessary to set up against the obligor.

It was unilaterally made.

In addition, it is true.

In general, it is not the same time when the fighting was unilaterally made, and if the fighting is viewed, it is not the letter of seal.

【A’s testimony, i.e., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g. g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g

Does this talk.