beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.09.22 2015가단9768

제3자이의

Text

1. The Defendant is based on the executory exemplification of the judgment of Jeju District Court 2014Kadan6922 against Nonparty B.

Reasons

1. Since movable property indicated in the separate list indicating the claim is owned by the plaintiff, it is unreasonable that the defendant seizes the aforementioned movable property by compulsory execution based on the executory exemplification of the judgment with executory power of the judgment of Jeju District Court 2014Da6922 against B (Article 208(3)1 of the Civil Procedure Act).