However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 18:50 on May 5, 2017, the Defendant, while drunkly talking about the victim C (49 tax) and disability ratings, etc. at the Defendant’s house located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and was punished for trial expenses, the Defendant saw chemical parts, which are dangerous objects, and caused the victim’s math, thereby making it difficult for the victim to know the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement made to C by the police in the protocol; and

1. Application of video-related Acts and subordinate statutes of photographs (Evidence No. 17 pages);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for Reduction of Small Quantity (Article 55 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 53 and Article 555 (1) 3 of the same Act (Article 55 of the Criminal Act that causes a somewhat contingent crime in the state of drinking, the degree of injury to the victim, and the agreement with the

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (resumed grounds, etc. for mitigation of the amount of punishment);