The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below was just in finding the Defendant guilty of obstruction of business among the facts charged in this case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on obstruction of business

In addition, the argument that the court below erred in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the offense of insult is not a legitimate ground for appeal, which is alleged in the ground of appeal by the defendant, or that the court below did not consider it as a subject of judgment ex officio.

In addition, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, the determination of the sentence is unreasonable.

In this regard, the assertion that there is an error in violation of Article 51 of the Criminal Act cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.