beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.20 2016가합506569

구상금

Text

1. As to KRW 286,688,962 among the Plaintiff and KRW 125,00,000 among the Plaintiff, Defendant A Co., Ltd., from August 20, 2014, and 161.

Reasons

(b) directly paid KRW 478,600 and KRW 200,000;

On December 2, 2013, the Defendants’ Agreement concluded on December 2, 2013, on December 2, 2013, the following documents were prepared and implemented: “Business Entrustment Agreement” stating that “The business operation and management place shall be within Defendant A’s management business place; Defendant Hoson Korea shall pay the Defendant the monthly rent of KRW 1.5 million and the monthly electricity fee for the entrusted equipment.”

(hereinafter referred to as “instant Second Arrangements.” A and A (hereinafter referred to as “B”) of the Business Entrustment Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “A” and “A” (hereinafter the same shall apply) shall enter into a contract with respect to the management of Lesson Korea (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant A”) as follows:

1) Studio-management place: B) “A” shall be paid monthly to “B” for a place rent of KRW 1,500,000 (excluding KRW 1,500,000/ value added tax) per month.

**** If rent is increased, after agreement between A and B.

3) “A” shall pay to “B” the electricity charges of the consignment equipment: monthly 1,500,000 won (excluding one thousand five hundred thousand won,00 won,00 won and value-added tax).******* after agreement between “A” and “B” in the event of an increase in the electricity charge. 4) “A” shall pay to “B” each month for the fee of the operation equipment.

After the Agreement No. 2, Defendant Ason Korea paid to Defendant A KRW 3 million each month (Article 2(2)1.5 million and KRW 2.5 million, respectively) and approximately KRW 6 million (Article 2(3)1.5 million and KRW 2.5 million, which was provided by Scar F, paid to Defendant A the fee for the use of the Leperf’s equipment (Article 2(4) of the Agreement).

Before and after the instant arrangement, there are differences between Defendant A and Defendant U.S., in terms of telephone, transmission and reception of e-mail, etc. (where audio signal itself is not received) or “X-Chek” in the head office server room and the equipment room of this case.