However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 00:45 on December 23, 2019, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s operation of the victim C’s singing room by force by avoiding disturbance for about 20 minutes, with the following reasons: (a) at the “singing room” operated by the victim C, which was operated by the victim C, an employee, who received a request from D to the effect that “the hours of use have been completed; (b) he was stamped; (c) laid off the table with drinking; (d) laid off the table; (e) cutting off the upper clothes; (e) cutting off the gate; (e) cutting down the gate; and (e) taking the singing out and taking a large amount of bath.

2. At the time, at the same time, at the same time as above paragraph 1 above, the injured Defendant was demanded from the victim D (at the age of 44 years to “the hours of use have been terminated, so you have come home.” The Defendant, by hand, pusheded the victim’s face and chest with the breath body, pushed the victim’s face and chest with the breath body, pushed the victim’s mouth, cut off the string, and was in line with the victim’s face, thereby damaging the part of the water pipe, fladum, and the part of the breath body part, etc. requiring treatment for about three weeks to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E, D, and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to suspect and victim photographs, video materials (video materials taken by suspect E on a cell phone), and injury diagnosis certificates of D;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 314(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act was committed by the Defendant by force, and not only interfered with the victim C’s singing-sing business, but also inflicted an injury on another female victim in the process, and the crime was not good. The Defendant, upon reporting by the victims, was investigated by the police.