When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On September 3, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant, at around 17:20 on September 3, 2015, at an elevator, the Cinstion 3-4 Ra in which he resides, and the neighbord victim D (58 years of age) was unable to engage in personnel management, and was able to boom the victim’s breath, and fladdd the head, following him.

2. On September 3, 2015, the Defendant committed assault, such as, at the management office of the foregoing Creshion, on the face of the police officer F (the age of 45), who was called out after receiving the report of the case described in the foregoing paragraph (1) and asked the circumstances of the instant case, “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am am in several times as I am, and am a ambling F's chest by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the occurrence of cases;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment (the fact that no other previous conviction exists except twice a fine for the previous 17 years and the fact that a mistake is reflected therein);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.