성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who operated a similar trading business establishment with the trade name “D” in Ilyang-gu, Ilyang-gu, U.S. Ctel 505 and 914, and E is a person who was employed at the above similar trading business establishment from June 5, 2017 and worked as a sexual traffic woman under the title of “F”.
The Defendant, from June 5, 2017 to June 20 of the same month, posted an advertisement on commercial sex acts at the same place on the Internet site, and reported it to the G “G”, and had unspecified male customers receive KRW 90,000 to KRW 110,00 in cash for each course in return for commercial sex acts, and let E, etc. do similar sexual intercourse in a manner that stimulates the sexual organ of the above male by hand, thereby bringing about KRW 30,00 to KRW 40,000 out of the above price per commercial sex acts for 16-day business period, thereby obtaining profits from arranging commercial sex acts for total 27 times during the 16-day business period.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;
1. On-site photographs of sexual traffic establishments;
1. Application of investigation reports (calculated of profits from arranging sexual traffic of suspects A) Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act for confiscation and collection, Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. [810,00 won (minimum intermediary profit per time 30,000 won x 27 times - 220,000 won (amount of confiscation];
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment is that the defendant engages in the brokerage of sexual traffic, and the ensuing harm is not that.
However, the business period and profits are relatively low, and the defendant does not have criminal records or criminal records of the same kind, and one parent does not have any economic difficulties due to justice.
statement shall be taken into account.
The above point is the same.