2. The crime of this case, which committed the crime of this case, is a situation unfavorable to the defendant, such as: (a) the defendant knife with a knife at the heart and finds the victim E who was not good for her punishment; (b) intimidation the victim H; and (c) damage the knife with a vehicle of the victim E; (d) the defendant has a heavy risk of committing an act; and (e) the defendant has the same kind of crime and this kind of crime, including two times a suspended sentence and two times a suspended sentence

On the other hand, it seems that the crime of this case is likely to result in contingent crimes, the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, reflects the fact that there was an agreement between the defendant and the victims, and the victims want not to be punished against the defendant, and that the defendant committed verbal abuse, such as the defendant's sentence to the defendant and the defendant's punishment should be dead, etc., and that contingently, it seems that the defendant committed the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant did not knife or display the victim H, the fact that the defendant did not focus on the degree of the damage of the

In full view of the above circumstances and other circumstances that led to the instant crime, including the background and motive leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, environment, occupation, etc., the lower court’s sentence is too uneasible and unreasonable, and thus, the Prosecutor’s allegation of unfair sentencing is not acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.