However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The defendant is a person who runs the business of driving B Cost Engines as his/her driver.

On February 26, 2013, at around 22:30, the Defendant should not drive a motor vehicle, etc. in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of alcohol or drugs. However, the Defendant driven the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.186%, while driving the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.186%, and was driving the motor vehicle in the direction of telephone station distance from the direction of the distance of telephone station at the highest level of the 442-9% in the Hancheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

At night and its location is where the center line of the yellow-ray is installed, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the front line and to safely drive the motor vehicle in the front line under the influence of alcohol, despite the negligence of driving the center line while under the influence of alcohol, the defendant, by the negligence of driving the motor vehicle in the opposite lane, caused the front part of the DNA motor vehicle driven by the victim C (W, 36 years old) who was driving on the opposite lane to the front part of the defendant vehicle, and led the victim E(S 47 years old) who was driving on the right side of the motor vehicle to shock the front part of the FFRad vehicle driven by the victim E(S 47 years old).

After all, the Defendant suffered from the above negligence that the victim C suffered from the injury, such as cutting the framework of the two structural frames, which requires approximately seven weeks of treatment, and the injury to the victim E in the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the river that requires approximately eight weeks of treatment.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the same time, the Defendant driven a Bone Star Co., Ltd. owned by G while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.186% at the section of approximately 1k from the vicinity of the Switzerland in the city of Bupyeong-si to the high-priced level of about 442-9, Seocheon-si, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H, E, and C;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;