동업 수익금 분배 청구의 소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The court's explanation concerning this case is based on ① the judgment of the court of first instance No. 2-A.
(2) The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same, except for the rejection of each of the statements in the evidence No. 17 through No. 22 and the testimony of the witness P of the party in question, which are insufficient to recognize that the money that the Defendant received from the party in the trial was a consideration for establishing the right to collateral security in the name of Yangsan-mixed with respect to the forest of this case and the forest of this case, which are submitted by the defendant in the trial of the party in question as follows. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article
A. Inasmuch as the agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant was terminated in the course of selling the forest of this case at will by the Plaintiff, the Defendant was obligated to pay 1/2 of the proceeds accrued until the termination of the agreement on the business under the agreement on the business under the agreement on the business under the agreement on the business under the same agreement to the Plaintiff. From April 16, 2001 to August 16, 2004, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the rent of 226,300,000 and the rent of 38,400,000, the sum of the rent of 264,70,700,000 (=226,30,000,000 won 38,40,000,000 won x KRW 38,40,000,000,000 x KRW 126,140,000,000, KRW 2815,2985,296,06.
2. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.