2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16093, Jan. 1,

The defendant is a person who drives a freezing train B.

On August 13, 2016, the Defendant driving the above vehicle at around 20:40, and driving the two-lane road in front of the D Hospital located in Gwangju Northern-gu C, according to two-lanes from the later bank of the OB beer and the two-lanes of the mass acid distance.

At this point, the center line of yellow-ray is installed as a bend road, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely proceed along the car line by reducing speed and making the front left well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and operated a strokely, and caused the center line and the opposite lane and delivery to the left-hand side while driving a strokely, and LGs received the second apartment stroke as the front-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant, by its occupational negligence, destroyed the 10,680,980 won of the repair cost of the said hullus, and, at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures in the event of a traffic accident, even if the c34,890 won of the repair cost of the FST5 vehicle owned by the victim E, parked near the said hullusus.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The application of the actual condition survey report, investigation report (related to the attachment of a damage statement), investigation report (related to the attachment of a damaged vehicle), estimates, and photographs at the scene of an accident;

1. Relevant provisions of Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts; and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;