폭행
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The Defendant is a public official belonging to Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim C (V, 47 years of age) is a wife, the victim D (V, 21 years of age) is a grandchild.
1. On October 10, 2015, around 23:30 on October 10, 2015, the Victim C assault Defendant: (a) returned to the Defendant, who was the victim in his/her inner beds, to the Defendant, who was in his/her inner beds, to the latter; (b) on the ground that:
The tear tear gas shall be teared.
"In doing so, they assaulted the victim's head debt and walking the ship and the side flag by putting the victim's head debt."
2. A person who listens to sound that is visible at the time and place of the victim DNA assault and asked the victim whether he/she will be a son, and the victim from the room shall be asked to the victim whether he/she will be a knicker, "packer", "a knicker", "a knicker", "a knicker", and assaulted him/her, such as taking the knick of the victim, and
2. The board shall not be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim in accordance with Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act as a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the same Act.
According to the records, it is recognized that the victim's withdrawal of the complaint and the letter of no punishment were received after the prosecution of this case to the effect that the victims do not want the punishment of the defendant. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.