A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, for a year of imprisonment for a defendant B, and for a period of six months of imprisonment for a defendant C, respectively.

except that this shall not apply.

Defendant

B On September 18, 2015, the Daegu District Court sentenced one year to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (fence) and became final and conclusive on December 29, 2015.

Defendant

A shall meet the requirements of the North Korea-Si Pohang-si

H. The representative of the company I with the fourth floor, the above I operates the business by subcontracting the steel bars and molds from construction companies, such as the two houses construction companies. Defendant B is the owner of the J-cafeteria that the daily workers of the above I provide meals, and Defendant C is the director of the above I who has reported employment insurance for the above two houses construction. In order for a person who has retired from employment at the workplace of employment insurance to receive unemployment benefits from the Ministry of Employment and Labor, the number of days worked for the 18-month period prior to the date of departure from employment should be more than 180 days, and the number of days worked for the one-month period prior to the date of application for recognition of eligibility should be less than 10 days.

1. Defendant A submitted a list of workers who were put into work for the above two Ri construction, which was the prime contractor, when Defendant A was awarded a subcontract for the work for the removal of the steel, the mold, etc. from the two Ri Construction, and the above two Ri Construction Workers, based on the above list received from the above I, entered the employees’ personal information, etc. on the employment insurance website of the Ministry of Employment and Labor, and paid the construction cost, etc. in accordance with the above I’s employment details, the Defendant was not entitled to receive the construction cost from the above two Ri Construction, etc. because he could not report the personal information on the illegal aliens on the part of the above subcontracted work because he was employed as a single worker by the above subcontractor

That said, the Defendant: (a) sought an employment insurance report on behalf of an employee who is the head of the above C, the above I Working Group; (b) K, the head of the above I Working Group; and (c) L, the head of the above I Working Group, on behalf of an employee who is an illegal alien, could not report employment insurance to the Ministry of Employment and Labor; and (d) as if so, it was false for six months.