Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On August 18, 2016, at around 13:30, the Defendant was present at the fixed date of the application for specification of property relations 1435, and submitted a list of property at the Seoul Eastern District Court No. 7, the creditor B, etc. filed against the Defendant at the Ulsan District Court. < Amended by Act No. 20154, Aug. 18, 2016>

In fact, the defendant won in the claim suit, such as a corrective report against the Republic of Korea, and submitted a list of assets not entered in the claim even though he/she had a monetary claim of KRW 3 million against the Republic of Korea, and submitted a false list of assets.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. The application of the text of the Supreme Court Decision 2015Na40312 Decided the search, property list, Ulsan District Court Decision 2015Da40346 Decided the Seoul High Court, the text of the Seoul High Court Decision 2015Na4346 Decided 2015Da33489 Decided the above-mentioned statutes

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 68(9) of the Civil Execution Act concerning the selection of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;