However, for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive against the Defendants, each of the above.

The Defendants, as a form of punishment, did not appear to be in harmony with the victim D (n, 61 years of age) who is the mother, and the peace.

On October 12, 2013, at around 13:00 on October 13, 2013, the Defendants thought that the Defendants would be present at the Em-emnas ceremony of F, a woman of the Defendant, who is going to leave the Emnasium, would be able to hear the Defendants’ awareness that the victims would be present and refrain from entering the wedding hall.

At around 12:00 on October 12, 2013, the Defendants agreed to the victim who arrived at the wedding hall in the above wedding hall; Defendant A asked Defendant B to go at the time of the operation of the car in G, and then the victim refused to pass the vehicle in G, but the victim refused to pass the vehicle. However, the Defendants carried the victim’s arms together with the victim’s arms at the back seat of the above car, thereby facing the shoulder of the victim.

The defendant A, on the side of the victim, was driving the above vehicle while driving it.

The Defendants continued to drive a female to the H rest area at a speed of more than 100 kilometers per hour without complying with the request from the victim on an expressway for getting off the expressway, and continued to see the female for about 10 minutes per hour and 10 minutes.

As a result, the Defendants detained the victims and inflicted bodily injury on their women on the base of salt and tensions, shoulder and arms, which require medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants and D by the prosecution

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 281 (1), 276 (1), and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the "justifiable circumstances") of the suspended sentence; and

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment for six months to fifteen years; and

2. Determination of sentence;