However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, on August 2015, at the Internet-friendly site called “C”, sent the victim’s b body pictures to the Internet, etc., which was taken by the victim, with the fact that the victim was associated with the Defendant and the victim was congested with another male, while she was able to teach the victim with the victim.

Intimidationd money was received and received.

On November 24, 2016, the Defendant sent a text message to the victim four times from that time to December 22, 201 of the same year, including sending the victim a text message with the following: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant sent the victim a cell phone with the statement that “an indemnity of two years in which he had been sent by personal person; (d) the pictures stored and stored by a bran bran video, and (e) the Defendant prepared for reporting to the police: (c) the copy of the photograph shall be kept by the inner body; and (d) the inner body shall be put up on the Internet if it is drawn up, from that time, from that time to December 8 of the same year, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Although the victim was frightened to receive property from the victim of frighten, the victim did not have money, and the victim did not report it to the police, and the victim did not commit the attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made with D;

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment to an e-mail sent additionally by the recipient), text message photograph;

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Relevant Article 352 of the Criminal Act and Articles 350 (1) (main sentence) and Article 350 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts; the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc.

1. The gist of the assertion was the victim’s intent to get the victim to return to himself/herself, and the victim actually receives money.