However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who works for a three-dimensional D store in Bupyeong-si B.

At around 17:13 on June 24, 2019, the Defendant: (a) used a gap in the management neglected by other employees around the time of leaving the said store; (b) used a ggal lusium 880,000 won market value of the victim C Co., Ltd., a company owned by the victim C, which was under custody, concealed one gal gal lus in packaging boxes, and cut off thereafter, up to July 1, 2019, up to six times in total, including seven gal PCs equivalent to the total market value of KRW 6.38,00,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. A police investigation report (CJ visit and investigation) and leakage of CCTV images, and receipts;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Scope of punishment by law: Not more than nine years of imprisonment;

2. Scope of recommendations based on the sentencing criteria: Imprisonment with prison labor for a period from April to February 20.

(a) Class 1, 2, and 3 (Determination of Punishment) thief [Attachment 1] thief [Attachment 1] thief [the scope of recommending and recommending punishment] basic area of larceny [the scope of recommending and recommending punishment], 4 to 8 months [the general person] - In cases where considerable damage has been recovered, serious reflector;

(b) Scope of recommendations according to the standards for handling multiple crimes: From April to February 20 (Article 1/2 of the upper limit of crimes No. 2) of imprisonment with prison labor;

3. Determination of sentence: The crime of this case for four months of imprisonment and one year of suspended sentence is not only a month since the defendant was punished by a fine due to a F fraud crime, and thus, the crime of this case is not more likely to be committed in light of the frequency of the crime, the amount of damage, etc.

However, the fact that the defendant is led to confession and reflect.