추가상병변경승인처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The process of the instant disposition
A. On January 25, 2010, the Plaintiff, an employee affiliated with Cheongbu, was treated at B hospital, etc., upon receiving medical care approval from the Defendant, due to the Plaintiff’s injury of the 5 wre pelle, the upper right 4 thalle, the thalle, and the 4th thale, and the thale of the 200 stalle stale, which were being used beyond the stale in the pipes (hereinafter “instant accident”). < Amended by Act No. 10337, Feb. 1, 2010; Act No. 10373, Jul. 31,
B. On February 6, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional injury and additional medical care with the Defendant under the name of injury and disease by using the “comprehion and spine transformation No. 2” due to the instant accident, but was subject to non-approval on April 4, 2012.
Accordingly, on May 21, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking revocation of the approval of additional medical care as the court 2012Guhap523, and received a partial winning judgment (this Court 2012Guhap523) that revoked the part of the approval of additional medical care on May 21, 2013. The above judgment became final and conclusive on June 12, 2013.
C. On June 28, 2013, the Plaintiff was approved as an additional injury and disease (hereinafter “instant additional injury and disease”). On July 10, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a claim for temporary disability compensation benefits from August 1, 2010 to February 6, 2012 with the Defendant. On September 10, 2013, the Defendant recognized the medical care period from August 1, 2010 to January 31, 201 with respect to the instant additional injury and disease, and issued the instant temporary disability compensation benefits from October 21, 2010 to pay the remainder of the site for temporary disability compensation benefits from August 1, 2010 to October 20, 201.
[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Evidence Nos. 1, 3, 8, 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is recognized as the period of medical care, since the Plaintiff received medical treatment from April 4, 201 due to the instant additional injury and disease.